 |
 |
|
| Afsendt: | 27-07-2004 21:01:57 |
| Afsender: | Kristoffer |
| Email: | mickey@mouse.com |
| Emne: | Helt sikker? |
| Tekst: | "Der er noget du skal læse på." Det har jeg prøvet på her: http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blogs/bechtold/archives/002320.shtml Der står blandt andet (25 juli 2004): "For several kinds of sound recordings, the U.S. now even provides a copyright term of 95 years from the year of first publication (for more information, see Dennis Karjala's chart here.) By contrast, the EU Copyright Term Directive only provides a protection of 50 years from the date the recording is made. It is no surprise that content owners have recently been pushing the EU to extend its protection for neighbouring rights such as sound recordings to 95 or at least 70 years as well." Det ser altså for mig ud som om der er forskel på indspilningsrettigheder (50 år) og værk (levetid + 70 år). Reuters rapporterer samme udlægning her: http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=musicNews&storyID=5696029 Uddrag fra den artikel: --- "LONDON (Billboard) - Fifty years after it was first released in the United States, Elvis Presley's "That's All Right" is a hit in Great Britain. The single entered the British charts last week at No. 3. But for BMG, the company releasing the track, the celebration might be short-lived. If there are no changes in European copyright law, the track will fall into public domain Jan. 1, 2005. Anyone will be able to release it without paying royalties to the owners of the master or the performer's heirs." --- Desværre omtales kun ejeren af den originale master og performer, men ikke kompositør. Men der er måske noget jeg har overset? ./ Kristoffer |